Elon Musk’s Tesla Faces Scrutiny Over Potential Conflict of Interest in $1.5 Billion Bitcoin Purchase

Elon Musk"s Tesla Faces Scrutiny Over Potential Conflict of Interest in $1.5 Billion Bitcoin Purchase

Tesla is facing more scrutiny over its $1.5 billion dollar bitcoin purchase. A Tesla board member who reportedly approved the company’s bitcoin buy deal is a cryptocurrency investor who also sits on the boards of two major crypto firms. Experts Question Conflict of Interest in Tesla’s Bitcoin Purchase

Tesla is further under scrutiny over its bitcoin purchase as experts now question whether there is a conflict of interest surrounding a director who approved the company’s big bitcoin purchase, the Telegraph reported Tuesday. Tesla recently revealed that it bought $1.5 billion worth of bitcoin in January and plans to accept the cryptocurrency as a form of payment for its products in the near future.

The conflict of interest question surfaced when it emerged that a Tesla director who approved the company’s bitcoin buy is also a crypto investor with ties to two crypto firms, the publication described. Antonio Gracias is listed on the Tesla website as an independent director and a member of the audit committee that signed off Tesla’s bitcoin deal. A long-time friend of Musk, he invested in Tesla in 2005 and has been on its board since 2007.

Gracias is also the founder, CEO, and chief investment officer of investment firm Valor Equity Partners, which has invested in two crypto companies. The first company is crypto custody service provider Bitgo and the other is crypto derivatives trading platform Erisx. He also sits on their boards. The publication added that Gracias was previously an investor in another crypto firm, the tokenization platform Harbor, which Bitgo acquired last year. The news outlet conveyed: Corporate governance experts said the shared roles created a potential conflict of interest that should mean him recusing himself.

Charles Elson, a finance professor at the University of Delaware, said: “Good prudence would have suggested a recusal in those circumstances.”

Bill Klepper, a professor of management at Columbia Business School, explained: “If there’s any direct conflict or appearance of that, you better stay arm’s length away from it. The right thing to have done would be to get the advice of legal counsel. We don’t know if he’s done that or not.” He further opined: We have to find out whether or not he is acting in good faith. It’s in the lack of transparency that you find people begin to question your ethics.

Gracias also sits on the board of Musk’s rocket company, Spacex, the news outlet added, noting that he is stepping down from Tesla this year.

Recently, lawyers warned that Tesla CEO Elon Musk could be probed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the electric car company’s bitcoin purchase. Meanwhile, the value of Tesla’s bitcoin stash has appreciated substantially as the price of BTC surged from around the $30K to $40K level in January to $52,408 at the time of writing.

Do you think there was a conflict of interest over Tesla’s bitcoin buy? Let us know in the comments section below. German Cannabis Firm Hedges Bitcoin to Protect from Massive Currency Devaluation NEWS | 9 hours ago NYDIG Registers for a Bitcoin ETF, Morgan Stanley Named a Participant in SEC Filing NEWS | 1 day ago Tags in this story bitcoin buy, Conflict of Interest, corporates bitcoin, Elon Musk, elon musk bitcoin, Tesla, tesla bitcoin buy, tesla bitcoin purchase

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons Spot-markets for Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ripple, Litecoin and more. Start your trading here. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Read disclaimerShow comments