Coinbase cleared in lawsuit over crypto transactions

Amaka Nwaokocha10 hours agoCoinbase cleared in lawsuit over crypto transactionsThe court’s decision hinged significantly on interpreting Coinbase’s user agreements, which evolved over time.9303 Total views30 Total sharesListen to article 0:00NewsOwn this piece of crypto historyCollect this article as NFTJoin us on social networksCoinbase, one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges, has achieved a significant victory in an ongoing lawsuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled in favor of Coinbase, confirming that the secondary sales of cryptocurrencies on its platform do not violate the Securities Exchange Act.

The court’s decision affects a nationwide group of people who traded tokens on Coinbase from Oct. 8, 2019, to March 11, 2022. At the heart of the dispute was whether Coinbase’s traded cryptocurrencies met the criteria for securities.

The plaintiffs lodged federal claimsunder Sections 5, 12(a)(1), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, alongside Sections 5, 15(a)(1), 20(a), and 29(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. They also presented state law claims related to securities legislation in California, Florida, and New Jersey, representing a nationwide class of individuals.Summary order by US Court of Appeals Second Circuit  Source: CTF Assets

The plaintiffs contended that Coinbase’s actions amounted to offering and selling unregistered securities. Furthermore, they accused it of violating various provisions of securities laws.

However, Coinbase contended that secondary crypto-asset sales didn’t meet securities transaction criteria, disputing the relevance of securities regulations. The Court of Appeals examined various aspects, ultimately overturning some of the lower court’s decisions while upholding others.

The court determined Coinbase’s potential liability under Section 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act for vending unregistered securities. Yet, it rejected the plaintiffs’ Securities Exchange Act claims, citing insufficient proof of transaction-specific contracts needed for rescission under Section 29.

Related:Coinbase secures restricted dealer license in Canada

The court’s decision hinged significantly on interpreting Coinbase’s user agreements, which evolved over time. Varying language across versions complicated title and privity issues critical to the case. Clarity on the applicable user agreement version was emphasized, with discrepancies hindering a definitive resolution.

The plaintiffs view the ruling as a step forward in holding crypto platforms accountable under securities laws, advocating for investor protection in the evolving crypto space. Conversely, Coinbase asserts the decision reinforces its position that secondary crypto sales aren’t securities transactions.

Furthermore, Coinbase stressed the necessity of regulatory clarity to foster innovation within the industry. The Court of Appeals’ verdict has substantial consequences for overseeing cryptocurrencies and digital assets.

Moreover, Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal expressed gratitude on X social platform, stating that the Second Circuit reaffirmed that there is no private liability for secondary trading of digital assets on exchanges like Coinbase under federal securities law, emphasizing the significance of contracts.

Magazine:How can Bitcoin payments stage a comeback?# Bitcoin# Coinbase# Cryptocurrencies# Law# United States# Cryptocurrency Exchange# RegulationAdd reactionRead moreUS consumer agency flags risks in virtual crypto economiesGenesis purchases $2.1B of Bitcoin following GBTC sell-offZachXBT claims he is being ‘borderline harassed’ by US law enforcement