Crypto.com petitions US court to uphold arbitration decision for mistakenly sent $50K

Turner Wright3 hours agoCrypto.com petitions US court to uphold arbitration decision for mistakenly sent $50KThe exchange said it “erroneously deposited” $50,000 into a user’s account in June 2022, receiving no response to requests to return the funds.638 Total viewsListen to article 0:00NewsJoin us on social networksCryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com has petitioned a Florida court to confirm a judgment in its favor through arbitration after the platform mistakenly deposited $50,000 into a user’s account.

According to the July 6 court filing, Crypto.com “erroneously deposited” $50,000 into James Deutero McJunkins’ account in June 2022, despite the user seemingly not earning the funds through trades or other activity. He immediately transferred the funds into an external bank account out of reach of Crypto.com’s authority and ignored repeated requests to return the money.

In October 2022, Crypto.com went to arbitration for the missing funds, claiming McJunkins had committed civil theft and breach of contract for his account. The arbitrator sided with the company and awarded Crypto.com $76,391.46 in April 2023 — based on the original $50,000 transaction, $1,786.11 in statutory interest, $21,205.35 in attorneys’ fees and $3,400 in arbitration costs.

Though Crypto.com “won” the proceedings, the arbitrator seemingly did not have the authority to force McJunkins to pay the exchange, forcing the firm to go to federal court for results. The July 6 petition said Crypto.com requested the Florida court “confirm the Arbitrator’s Award and enter a final judgment in its favor and against McJunkins” for the amount owed.

Related:Crypto.com accidentally sends 320k ETH to Gate.io, recovers funds days after

The case is reminiscent of an incident between Crypto.com and two Australia-based users in May 2021. In that case, the exchange reportedly sent more than $6 million to a couple’s account and didn’t discover the error until December 2021. The pair allegedly spent the bulk of the funds, claiming they believed the money was a prize from the exchange. Authorities in Australia charged the two with theft, and the case is still ongoing.

Magazine:Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation# Law# Transactions# Court# RegulationAdd reactionAdd reactionRelated NewsWhat are fan tokens, and how do they work?The Supreme Court could stop the SEC’s war on cryptoWhy a Bitcoin ETF approval would be a big dealMango Markets exploiter behind alleged $116M theft will stand trial in DecemberDo Kwon denies forging passport, blames ‘Chinese’ agency: ReportUS Supreme Court halts Coinbase cases in its first crypto ruling