UK Law Commission report challenges Craig Wright’s suit against Bitcoin developers

Ana Paula Pereira2 hours agoUK Law Commission report challenges Craig Wright’s suit against Bitcoin developersA report published by the U.K. Law Commission bolsters Bitcoin core developers’ defense that they are not liable for 111,000 BTC taken by hackers.702 Total viewsListen to article 0:00Follow upJoin us on social networksA recent report released by the United Kingdom’s Law Commission could weaken a central argument brought by Craig Wright in his controversial lawsuit against 12 Bitcoin core developers, argues the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund (BLDF).

In a 300-page report on digital assets published in late June, the Law Commission — an independent body that reviews and recommends reforms to U.K. and Whales laws — cited a classification of fiduciary duty that bolsters the developers’ defense that they are not directly responsible for 111,000 Bitcoin (BTC) lost to hackers.

Wright, owner of Tulip Trading, claimed in a 2021 lawsuit that developers involved in the open-source development of Bitcoin Core owed him a fiduciary duty in connection with his loss. In order to recover the allegedly stolen funds, Wright is seeking a back door into the Bitcoin Core blockchain. Wright is also known for claiming he is Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto.The bitcoin protocol was set in stone to create a system that is stable. Bitcoin is not a Cryptocurrency. By definition, Cryptocurrencies are anonymous and untraceable. Bitcoin is pseudonymous and traceable, it is digital cash.

Don"t believe everything you see at first sight. pic.twitter.com/vPt4a0fEEx— Dr Craig S Wright (@Dr_CSWright) May 30, 2023

The U.K. report sheds light on the definition of fiduciary duty, claiming that categories of fiduciary recognized by the law include “agents, trustees, partners, company directors, and solicitors." The report said fiduciary duty rarely exists outside these categories. According to the BLDF, the developers’ legal representative, the defendants do not fit any criteria mentioned by the Commission.

“They are not agents, trustees, partners, company directors, or solicitors, and they never ‘undertook or were entrusted with authority to manage the property or make discretionary decisions on behalf of another person,’” BLDFstated in a recent blog post, adding that “Bitcoin was created to facilitate transactions between individuals without the need to entrust any authority to a third party."

According to a definition by the University of Texas, fiduciary duty is the “legal responsibility to act solely in the best interest of another party." Common examples of fiduciary duties include undivided loyalty, due diligence, full disclosure of conflicts of interest and confidentiality.

The Tulip Trading suit could set case law for open-source developers’ liability for assets, with a trial in the case expected to occur in 2024. During the Bitcoin 2023 conference in May, Jessica Jonas, BLDF’s chief legal officer, noted that potential legal ramifications of the lawsuit could deeply affect the community of open-source developers, as 97% of the world’s software programs are open-sourced.

The U.K. Law Commission report alsopushed for the creation of a new and distinct category of personal property to accommodate the unique features of digital assets.

Magazine: $3.4B of Bitcoin in a popcorn tin — The Silk Road hacker’s story# Bitcoin# Open Source# Court# Craig Wright# DevelopersAdd reactionAdd reactionRelated NewsWho invented NFTs?: A brief history of nonfungible tokensBitcoin ETFs: Even worse for crypto than central exchangesThe Supreme Court could stop the SEC’s war on cryptoBinance to deactivate some deposit addresses for wallet upgradeNamibia passes bill to regulate crypto and digital assetsBTC price abruptly dips below $30K as Bitcoin daily candle turns sour