Don’t Forget the Importance of Censorship Resistance

외신뉴스
2022-11-29 14:30 PM

Don’t Forget the Importance of Censorship Resistance


Since people are once again talking about self-custody as one of crypto’s unique strengths, I would like to remind everyone about an equally important fundamental value proposition of crypto that, in the early days, was touted as the killer feature. I’m talking about censorship resistance.


The following opinion editorial was written by Bitcoin.com CEO Dennis Jarvis. “Almost all blocks since The [Ethereum] Merge.” Red represents censored blocks. Image and text from @takenstheorem on Twitter. The Three Pillars of Censorship Resistance


In the financial context, censorship resistance is the ability to carry out financial actions despite the wishes of any third party.


In crypto, the three pillars of censorship resistance are: The freedom to transact. This means third parties cannot prevent you from sending or receiving assets. The freedom from confiscation. Third parties cannot take away or freeze your assets. The immutability of transactions. It is impossible for third parties to change or revert transactions after the fact.


Troubling actions increasingly taken by centralized entities in the public and private sector demonstrate the importance of censorship resistance. Let’s look at some examples: Public Sector Censorship


Governments have shown an increased willingness to exert control of financial institutions while also ratcheting up their crypto regulatory efforts. Earlier in the year, Trudeau’s Canadian government took the unprecedented step of invoking emergency powers to freeze or suspend the bank accounts of Canadian citizens without court orders. Their crime? Donating funds to fellow citizens participating in the Freedom Convoy protests.


The U.S. Treasury Department’s watchdog the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) made headlines this summer by banning and sanctioning addresses that used Tornado Cash, a decentralized application that improved privacy for users by “mixing” ETH.


The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) increased crypto regulatory actions, best exemplified by this quote from SEC Chairman Gary Gensler who said, “…the SEC will serve as the cop on the beat. As with seat belts in cars, we need to ensure that investor protections come standard in the crypto market.” This isn’t merely empty rhetoric, the SEC nearly doubled the size of the Division of Enforcement’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit in 2022. Private Sector Censorship


Post-merge, a majority of Ethereum’s blocks are compliant with OFAC. This is a potential problem because OFAC-compliant relays will not include any transactions that interact with the Tornado Cash smart contract or other sanctioned wallet addresses as designated by OFAC. Not all blocks built by OFAC compliant relays are censoring, however, all blocks built by OFAC compliant relays will censor when non-compliant transactions are broadcast to the network. As Martin Köppelmann, the co-founder of Gnosis, noted about the state of OFAC compliant relays, “[t]his means if the censoring validators would now stop attesting to non-censoring blocks they would eventually form the canonical, 100% censoring chain.” Image from mevwatch.info


Centralized stablecoin companies Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) havea historyof cooperating with law enforcement requests to freeze assets. Circle compliedwith OFAC’s Tornado Cash sanctions by banning “tainted” USDC. So far Tether has decided to not comply, but that can change (and probably will, given sufficient pressure) in the future.


Outside of crypto, Paypal made international newswhen it released an updated policy that let Paypal fine users $2,500 for spreading ‘misinformation.’ Paypal quickly retracted the policy in public, though much of the language remains. This includes $2,500 fines that have existed since September 2021for the very vague “promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory…”


While Paypal was almost universally condemned, its actions are consistent with a growing number of web2 companies, such as Twitter, Youtube, and Facebook, who are using their platforms to punish behavior they deem “bad” through levers like demonetization, suspensions, and bans.


Censorship Resistance Is the Antidote


Censorship resistance is one of the main value propositions of decentralized finance in general and Bitcoin specifically because it fundamentally separates the technology from any traditional financial tools. In fact, censorship resistance is so strong in Bitcoin as to render it an economic freedom enhancing technology. This dramatization powerfully demonstrates why:


The silver lining to the concerning increase in authoritarian actions from both the public and private sector is that they are helping refocus attention on censorship resistance.


Bitcoin, once the embodiment of crypto, had become ridiculed as worse than boring — antiquated. It’s nice to see this begin to shift back as people inside and out of crypto reacquaint themselves with its deceptively simple power.


Within the crypto industry, more people are paying attention to the slow creep of web2-like features of speed and cheap transactions that are coming at the cost of censorship resistance. For example, prominent developers like the aforementioned Martin Köppelmann are sounding the alarms that the percentage of OFAC compliant blocks needs to be fixed. It’s also nice to see debates about censorship resistance begin to take up more oxygen within the broader crypto community. I particularly enjoyed Erik Voorhees’ pieceon the empowering nature of defi.


This is not to say that all crypto projects need to be censorship resistant; indeed censorship resistance itself exists on a spectrum. Yet it is vital that some crypto projects remain robustly censorship resistant. At Bitcoin.com, we are proud to offer tools like the Bitcoin.com Wallet, that anyone can use to self-custody their Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As an industry, let’s take the events of the last year to remember how important censorship resistance is. Let’s not sacrifice this industry-defining attribute for short sighted gains. Tags in this story asset freeze, bitcoin whitepaper, canada truckers, Censorship, Censorship Resistance, Circle, confiscation, convoy, Economic Freedom, Erik Voorhees, Financial Surveillance, ftx, Gary Gensler, Gnosis, Immutability, killer feature, Martin Köppelmann, OFAC, Peer-to-peer, permissionless, SEC, Self-custody, Stablecoins, surveillance, Tornado cash, USDC, USDT, Wallet, Web3


What are your thoughts on this story? Let us know in the comments section below. Guest Author


This is an Op-ed article. The opinions expressed in this article are the author"s own. Bitcoin.com does not endorse nor support views, opinions or conclusions drawn in this post. Bitcoin.com is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy or quality within the Op-ed article. Readers should do their own due diligence before taking any actions related to the content. Bitcoin.com is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any information in this Op-ed article. To contribute to our Op-ed section send a suggestion to op-ed (at) bitcoin.com. Web3 Must Overcome Significant UX Challenges to Reach Mass Adoption OP-ED | Nov 12, 2022 Cryptocurrency as Money — Store of Value or Medium of Exchange? OP-ED | Oct 6, 2022


Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons Previous articleMark Cuban: If I Were Sam Bankman-Fried, I’d Be Afraid of Going to Jail for a Long Time Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Read disclaimerShow comments More Popular NewsIn Case You Missed ItToday"s Top Ethereum and Bitcoin Mining Devices Continue to Rake in Profits


As the crypto economy hovers just under $2 trillion in value, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) mining devices are making decent profits. While ASIC miners can still mine ethereum, a 1.5 gigahash (GH/s) Ethash mining device can rake in $51.58 per ... read more.Bill ‘On Digital Currency’ Caps Crypto Investments for Russians, Opens Door for Payments UAE Airliner Emirates to Launch NFTs and Experiences in the Metaverse Survey: Adoption in Argentina Grows, With 12 out of 100 Adults Having Invested in Crypto Digital Ruble ‘Much Needed,’ Russia’s Central Bank Says, Won’t Delay Testing

외신뉴스
Crypto news


함께 보면 좋은 콘텐츠

All posts
Top